DIFC Courts Issue First Judgement Summoning UAE Witnesses

0
203
United Arab Emirates

DIFC Courts InHouse Community

The DIFC Court of First Instance has, for the first time in its history, issued a judgement allowing the examination of witnesses resident in the UAE pursuant to two requests for judicial assistance (Letters Rogatory) from the District Court of the State of Minnesota, USA (the US Court).

The judgement, issued by Justice Robert French, clarifies the scope of Rules 30.65, 30.66 and 30.67 of the Rules of the DIFC Courts (the RDC).

Overview of Dispute

The Letters Rogatory were issued by the US Court further to the application of a Defendant in two claims relating to, among other things, product liability of a manufacturer. The Plaintiffs in both cases claimed losses and damages as a result of an accident which occurred in Sharjah by initiating proceedings before the US Court.

Given that a number of witnesses and authorities concerned with the first-hand events of the incident were resident in the UAE, the US Court, on the application of the Defendant, requested assistance from the DIFC Courts in obtaining the testimony of those witnesses and documents relating to the incident.

The Defendant issued Part 8 proceedings in the DIFC Courts pursuant to Rules 30.65, 30.66 and 30.67 of the RDC without naming any defendants. RDC 30.65 and RDC 30.66 specifies wide powers for the DIFC Courts to grant assistance to foreign courts:

RDC 30.65

Where an application is made to the Court for an order for evidence to be obtained in the DIFC and the Court is satisfied:

(1) that the application is made in pursuance of a request issued by or on behalf of a court or tribunal (“the requesting court”) exercising jurisdiction in:

(a) Dubai; or

(b) in any other part of the UAE;

(c) or in a country or territory outside the UAE; and

(2) that the evidence to which the application relates is to be obtained for the purposes of proceedings which either have been instituted before the requesting court or whose institution before that court is contemplated;

The Court shall have the powers conferred on it by the following provisions of this Section of this Part.”

RDC 30.66

The Court shall have the power, on an application under Rule 30.65, by order to make such provision for obtaining evidence in the DIFC as it may appear to the Court to be appropriate for the purpose of giving effect to the request in pursuant of which the application is made: and any such order may require a person specified therein to take such steps as the Court may consider appropriate for that purpose.

The Defendant requested the DIFC Courts to allow the examination of the witnesses and documents specified in the Letters Rogatory under oath or affirmation in the DIFC Courts by a practitioner authorized by the DIFC Courts’ Registrar.

The Judgement

In allowing the application of the Defendant in the US Proceedings, Justice Robert French held that the reliefs requested were “appropriate” after an analysis of the relevant provisions in the RDC as well as the DIFC Courts’ jurisdiction conferred upon it by Article 5(a) of the Judicial Authority Law No 12 of 2004 and Article 19(1)(d) of the DIFC Court Law No 10 which states as follows:

“The DIFC Court of First Instance has original jurisdiction pursuant to Article 5(A) of the Judicial Authority law to hearing any of the following:

(d) any application over which the DIFC Court has jurisdiction in accordance with DIFC Laws and Regulations.”

In his judgment, Justice French went on to hold that the DIFC Court Rules (i.e., the RDC), which are made by the President of the DIFC “answer the description of “DIFC Regulations”” for the purposes of Article 19(1)(d) of the DIFC Court Law.

Analysis

The judgement, which is a welcome development, would open avenues for international courts to request assistance from the DIFC Courts in disputes which involve witnesses resident in the UAE and who cannot otherwise be summoned to provide evidence before those courts for a number of reasons. In the past, such requests had to be directed through diplomatic channels to the “on-shore” courts of the UAE which would take a considerable amount of time to be communicated. The acceptance of such requests by the on-shore courts were largely subject to the existence of evidence of reciprocity among the UAE courts and the requesting court or the existence of specific treaties.

The judgement also confirms the DIFC Courts’ pragmatic approach to be an “international” common law court willing to expand its jurisdiction where required in the interests of justice.


Authors:

Stuart Walker Afridi Angell InHouse Community

Stuart Walker

Sulakshana Senanayake Afridi Angell InHouse Community

Sulakshana Senanayake

http://afridi-angell.com/

Afridi & Angell’s Stuart Walker and Sulakshana Senanayake acted for the defendant in the US proceedings in obtaining the judgement from the DIFC Courts.

Related Articles by Firm
UAE amends the Labour Law

The amendments introduce equal treatment for male and female employees in respect of compensation and parental leave …
Merger clearance matters in the UAE

Despite the limited number of filings and the dearth of decisions, parties conducting M&A in or from the UAE should consider the impact of the competition regime.
Federal Penal Code amendments

The amendments are designed to make the UAE’s Penal Code consistent with other recent federal legislation and current federal enforcement policies.
Netting arrangements made enforceable in the UAE

For decades, banks and other counterparties in the UAE have obtained financial services from foreign financial institutions. Industry bodies, such as the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), the International Capital Market Association and the International Securities Lending Association, have …
ADGM announces tech start-up licensing regime

The licence provides access to a Professional Services Support Programme aimed at allowing entrepreneurs entry to a community of businesses, financial services and professional advisers.
Off-plan sales in Dubai: Risks and rewards

Whether buyers are looking to expand their real estate portfolio or buyers are simply looking to find their ideal home, great deals can be found in Dubai’s off-plan real estate sector …
Opportunities in Dubai’s Healthcare Sector

Dubai is the fastest growing healthcare market within the GCC and is becoming an increasingly attractive sector for investors. Afridi & Angell explain the key drivers and options available to investors …
New UAE Funds Regime

The UAE has embarked on an ambitious undertaking by introducing new business friendly mutual funds regulations to stimulate the UAE funds industry and provide the foundation for a more developed regional funds regime in the Gulf Cooperation Council …
The UAE Competition Law Clarified

Two Cabinet Decisions have been issued which provide guidance on the implementation of the Competition Law, particularly on market share thresholds and on small and medium establishments.
The New UAE Bankruptcy Law

Perhaps the most important new feature of the new Law is the introduction of a regime that allows for protection and reorganization of distressed businesses …
The thing about … Amjad Ali Khan

Recently in Dubai, ASIAN-MENA COUNSEL’s Patrick Dransfield photographed Amjad Ali Khan, the co-founder and Managing Partner of Afridi & Angell and also put to him a series of questions on behalf of the …
UAE Ministerial Decision No. (272) of 2016

The Ministerial Decision No. (272) of 2016 addresses the scope of Article 104 of Federal Law No.2 of 2015, stating which articles relating to public and private joint stock companies apply to limited liability companies.
Doing Business in Iran: the banking bottleneck

With the easing of sanctions against Iran, vast business opportunities have opened up. The challenge is whether and how to participate in such a potentially phenomenal market without taking undue risks.
UAE Legal Bulletin

Updates on the possibility of a Value Added Tax, the new PPP Law and other developments which companies doing business in the UAE should know
UAE Legal Bulletin July-August 2015

Insights into the new Commercial Companies Law and relevant corporate updates which can help companies conduct business in the UAE, particularly in Dubai
Do I need a DIFC will?

With the opening of the Wills and Probate Registry in the DIFC, it is now possible to register a will in Dubai and have a high degree of confidence that it will be enforced.
DFSA imposes record fine on Deutsche Bank

The Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) imposes its largest fine to date on Deutsche Back AG Dubai (DIFC Branch), sending a strong signal that DFSA is both independent and unafraid to take on well-resourced opponents.
UAE Competition Law – All bark and no bite?

Federal Law No. 4 of 2012 on the regulation of competition (the “Competition Law”) introduced a regime for the regulation of anti- competitive behavior in the UAE which previously did not exist …
Related Articles
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Latest Articles